PACT survey: 83% of California voters support lawsuit abuse reform to cut rising costs

Lauren Zelt, Executive Director of the Protecting American Consumers Together (PACT)
Lauren Zelt, Executive Director of the Protecting American Consumers Together (PACT)
0Comments

Protecting American Consumers Together (PACT) has released new survey findings concerning Californians’ perspectives on the state’s cost of living and the effects of lawsuit abuse.

According to a poll conducted by PACT, 90% of registered California voters report an increase in their overall cost of living over the past year. The survey also reveals that 72% of these voters identify “lawsuit abuse” as a significant factor contributing to rising household expenses. Furthermore, 83% of respondents express that the California Legislature should implement reforms to eliminate what is described as a “hidden tax” amounting to approximately $5,500 due to lawsuit abuse.

In the same survey, 86% of registered voters in California indicate that their state legislator should prioritize stopping lawsuit abuse over protecting personal injury lawyers. This reflects a strong voter preference for legislative reforms aimed at reducing perceived litigation abuses rather than maintaining current personal injury legal practices. The data suggests that concerns about lawsuit abuse extend beyond legal discourse and are viewed as an economic issue affecting families across California.

The PACT poll, referenced in a Tort Reform source, shows that 93% of those surveyed rate the State Legislature’s performance as “poor” or “fair” regarding efforts to control living costs for California families. This indicates widespread dissatisfaction with legislative actions on economic issues, potentially reflecting broader frustrations related to inflation, housing, healthcare, and other daily expenses. Voters appear to partly attribute these challenges to perceived legislative inaction on addressing lawsuit abuse.

An article published on Zurich’s official website provides insights into how courts determine vicarious liability. It explains how employers and organizations can be held strictly liable for wrongful acts committed by employees—even when not directly at fault—ensuring victims receive compensation even if the primary wrongdoer cannot pay. Additionally, it discusses crucial legal tests like the “close connection” requirement that set limits on liability, assisting businesses in managing risks without facing excessive legal claims.

PACT is an advocacy organization dedicated to highlighting the financial and economic impacts of lawsuit abuse and advocating for legal reforms aimed at reducing consumer costs.



Related

Laurence Darmiento, Staff Writer for Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times reporter on insurance reform: ‘Prop 103 is not being amended anytime soon’

Laurence Darmiento, a staff writer for the Los Angeles Times, reported that competing proposals related to changes in Proposition 103 have been officially withdrawn.

dummy-img

Rebuild California’s Mike Netter on insurance exodus: ‘The political class in Sacramento created this crisis’

Mike Netter, vice chair of Rebuild California, said on X that overregulation by state leaders has fueled an insurance exodus, which he says is harming families and small businesses.

dummy-img

California resident on rising auto rates: ‘My auto insurance is ridiculous’

Gabriel Santillan, a resident of California, has expressed concern over the sharp rise in auto insurance premiums affecting his household.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from LA Commercial News.